Anonymous editing has been enabled. Learn more.
Deh
This page is Coal. (You) WILL help by expanding it.
THIS ARTICLE IS A HOAX | ||
The subject of this article is about as real as the jarty is alive. Take everything below with a grain of sproke. |
Deh is a DEAD VARIANT | |
This soyjak variant gets posted on the 'log less than once a month. Only (You) can revive it, soyteen. |
Somebody call fuckin' Soyberg! The following was likely written during a schizo episode. You WILL remind the author to take his meds. |
Deh | |
---|---|
Soyjak variant | |
Origin | Unknown |
Booru Posts | 7 As of September 10 2023 |
Traced From | Voldemort |
Deh is yet another dead variant; aside from the poor quality trace such a failure of a variant can only be because it was traced from the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.